StarTribune.com

The political season’s big winners

Posted on October 24th, 2008 – 3:03 PM
By Neal Justin

The election may be a little more than a week away, but I’m ready to declare a winner: It’s CBS.

 Six months ago, Katie Couric was supposedly ready to abandoned her anchor post and do dinner theater in Branson. But Couric did something many of the fortune tellers didn’t see in their crystal balls. She did her job. Fans of the journalist - and I’m one of them - knows she has a knack for doing interviews with questions that stretch beyond the talking points. When Couric was allowed to do that - especially with the “Presidential Questions” segment and her interviews with Sarah Palin - she proved why she absolutely deserved the post she got.

Yes, CBS is still mired in third place, but the network had a credibility problem. It doesn’t anymore, and getting rid of that is as valuable as 12 ratings points.

A close second goes to CNN. As Fox and MSNBC battle it out, CNN has stayed - in my mind - in the middle as well as anyone has. I know some of you will disagree, and urge you to weigh in, but do me a favor: Give me specific examples of where you’ve seen unbalanced coverage (within news shows) rather than just paint broad swipes at the news outlets. That’s too easy - and unfair.

A message to the next generation of journalists

Posted on October 21st, 2008 – 2:10 PM
By Neal Justin

I had the privilege Tuesday afternoon to be the keynote speaker at the Minnesota High School Press Assocation convention, which included about 500 students, many of whom are considering a career in journalism. I thought I’d share with you the transcript from my speech:

Show of hands. How many of you are here today because you’re considering a career in journalism? How many of you are here just so you could skip a day of school? I see a lot of teachers raised their hands.

I want to start off by telling you a heartwarming story about how I almost gave my father a heart attack.

I was a senior in high school when I sat my parents down and told them that I wanted to be a journalist. I was grounded for five months. Seriously, my parents have been very supportive over the years, but at the time, I could appreciate their nervousness.

My father was an immigrant from India who came to this country so his children could strike it rich. Working at a newspaper did not seem to be the most efficient way to get that done. I’m sure the old man was worried that I’d be living in his basement for the next 30 years.

If my parents were worried, I’m sure yours are petrified. You’ve all heard the predictions: The nightly news on TV will be replaced by reruns of “According to Jim.” Magazines will only be dedicated to the trials and tribulations of Lindsay Lohan. Newspapers will go the way of the Tyronasaurus Rex. Noone on Earth will ever, ever read again.

Well, I’ve got a message for your parents: Relax. You’re going to be OK. More people are reading and watching news than ever before. The problem - and it’s a short-term one - is that everyone is getting it for free. The CBS Evening News is struggling in the ratings even though Katie Couric’s interviews with Sarah Palin are You Tube blockbusters. Yes, circulation at the Star Tribune is down, but only in newspaper form. Over on the internet, we’re hotter that funnyordie.com. We just have to figure out an economic model that assures that consumers get all the news they want and that, at the same time, guys like me don’t starve.

That’ll happen. What startles me is that a lot of professors, economic experts and professional journalists don’t seem to agree. They continue to tell you to embark on safer careers like accounting or lion taming. Well I have a message for them too, and it’s a little bit blunter than the one to your parents: Shut the hell up.

Discouraging the next generation from following their dreams, their desire, their passion,s should be as sinful as plagarism. It’s like telling you not to get on the coolest roller coaster at Disneyworld because there’s a chance you might fall out of the car on the third loop or saying you can’t have chocolate cake for dessert because you’ll automatically end up looking like Peter Griffin. (Family Guy reference) If journalism thrills you, I beg of you. Don’t listen to cynics.

If you do, you’ll end up missing the ride of your life.

I’m not saying you won’t have some tough times. A couple of years ago, I took some high school students to visit Brian WIlliams at his news studio in New York and he told them about his rough patches, that included sleeping in his car. When I was in college, I spent a summer clerking at the Chicago Tribune. This was before e-mails - the Prehistoric era - and much of my time was spent opening mail for editors and delivering something called faxes, which you may have read about in history books. It was pretty basic stuff, but I was thrilled. I was also close to broke. I had just enough money for my greatest necessity: beer. I would figure out which downtown bars were serving what food during happy hour every day of the week, like, say Taco Night at Mother’s, and I would nurse the cheapest bottle they had, and gorge on the free grub. That was dinner for three months. When I took my real professional job in Rockford, Ill. as a regional reporter, I was making $24,000, which was pretty good back in 1991. The people starting off in TV in Rockford weren’t as lucky. A lot of them made under $20,000 a year and had to buy there own on-air wardrobes. You know what? We survived - and we still had enough cash for beer.

Any career worth having will present obstacles - but I wouldn’t trade those experiences for the world.

I’ve gotten to a place now where I get to dig into juicy stories and meet some fascinating people. I’ve hung out backstage with Bruce Springsteen, gotten a tour of Hannah Montana’s dressing room from the teen queen herself, interviewed Jimmy Kimmel on the floor of his office, visited Sharon Stone in her house, danced alongside MC Hammer while Vanilla Ice performed a karoake version of “Ice, Ice Baby.”

But it’s those early stories, those early experiences that shaped me and, believe it or not, they were just as exciting as any of my more star-studded assignments.

It started in high school. I was blessed to have an outstanding adviser at Mason City High School in Iowa by the name of Paul Peterson. He now teaches at the North Iowa Area Community College and has inspired more than a few young people to follow their journalism dreams. He stood by us when we wrote critical stories about administrators and dared to take on provacative issues. I know not all schools are lucky enough to have that kind of leadership and that kind of freedom. I understand that. But I also understand how important all you teachers out there can be. I’m well aware that you have one of the toughest, most frustrating, most underappreciated jobs out there. This may be small consolation, but if it means anything, I wouldn’t be here today without the teachers of Mason City High School, especially Paul Peterson. I hope that means something to all of you and I hope it means something to your students too, if not today, then down the line. You can and do make a difference.

It’s one of the reasons I co-founded J Camp and I want to tell you a little about the program before we dive into Q&A. I’ve left quite a bit of time, because I think, for young journalists, there’s nothing more valuable than asking questions, so I hope there will be lot of hands up. But first, J Camp.

We scour the country every year to find the 42 most outstanding teenagers in the country who have a high interest in journalism. We don’t take current seniors, because we want our graduates to be able to come back to their schools and spread the lessons they’ve learned to their classmates and teachers. It’s an aggressive application process, but if you’re selected, you’ll travel to one of the country’s greatest cities. In 2009, we’ll be in Boston and Los Angeles the year after that. If you’re selected, you’ll go through four full days of intense, eye-opening experiences designed to not only improve your journalism skills, but your networking skills as well. Our volunteer staff are all professional journalists from such esteemed companies as the Washington Post, CNN and, yes, The Star Tribune. You meet some of the industry’s most impressive leaders like New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., CNN’s Soledad O’Brien, “All the President’s Men” co-author Carl Bernstein, The Today show’s Hoda Kotb, Rolling Stone’s Toure and the late, great Ed Bradley. And here’s the best part: Everyone attends absolutely free. We cover room, board, travel expenses, everything. It’s our way of giving back and prepping the next generation. That’s my contribution. Yours is to apply and to spread the word. Applications for next summer will be available starting in early January. You can download them and read more about the program at aaja.org. I look forward to being wowed by your applications just as I look forward to your questions right now.

 

 

 

 

 

njustin@startribune.com • 612-673-7431

 

Politics and late-night television

Posted on October 20th, 2008 – 1:16 PM
By Neal Justin

It was a big week for the Republican ticket - and I’m not talking about the polls. Sarah Palin’s appearance on “Saturday Night Live” drew about 14 million viewers, a number up 161 percent from October of last year, and the highest ratings since Nancy Kerrigan hosted in 1994. “Late Show With David Letterman” got its best numbers in three years, thanks to John McCain’s “mea culpa” sit-down with the cranky host.

How did they do? Better than their platforms. Letterman’s sour attitude towards McCain for canceling an appearance at the last minute was amusing at first, and then increasingly grating. So you got stood up, Dave. Get over it. But he couldn’t. Too much of Wednesday’s interview consisted of Letterman still fuming over the slight, followed by a series of Palin bashing that led to nowhere. When it comes to politics, Letterman can be an effective interviewer, but his ire got the best of him on Wednesday. McCain, for his part, ended up looking like a martyr - which is probably the best case scenario he could have hoped for.

Palin was joined on “SNL” by Josh Brolin, Tina Fey, Mark Wahlberg, Oliver Stone and Alec Baldwin, none of whom shined on another lackluster episode. Palin’s first sketch seemed hobbled together at the last minute and Baldwin either couldn’t look Palin in the eye or was hypnotized by the cue cards. Either way, it felt flat. Amy Poehler saved the day with her “Weekend Update” rap with Palin looking on and doing a very effective “chair dance” (she may have more rhythm than Barack Obama). For a more effective appearance, take a look back at when John McCain hosted “SNL” back in 2002, when he did a delightful sendup of Barbra Streisand tunes. Even better, youtube Obama and McCain’s speeches this past week at the Alfred E. Smith dinner. These two politicos do a better job of sending themselves up than Letterman and the gang at “SNL” could ever do.

Fifteen sitcoms worth watching

Posted on October 17th, 2008 – 3:51 PM
By Neal Justin

For two weeks now, I’ve dedicated my Sunday column to ripping into new sitcoms (”Kath & Kim” last week, “Rita Rocks” this week). Just be show I’m not a total, humorless curmudgeon, I’ve listed 15 sitcoms well worth watching, in order of preference. Some of the shows may not be airing new episodes at the time, but all are currently in production or have new episodes coming. Also, hour-long dramedies and animated shows were disqualified. Let me know what I missed - and what I should have left off:

1) “Curb Your Enthusiasm” (HBO)

2) “Weeds” (SHO)

3) “The Office” (NBC)

4) “30 Rock” (NBC)

5.) “”New Adventures of Old Christine” (CBS)

6) “My Boys” (TBS)

7) “Flight of the Conchords” (HBO)

8) “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” (FX)

9) “Scrubs” (ABC)

10) “Entourage” (HBO)

11) “The Big Bang Theory” (CBS)

12) Everybody Hates Chris” (CW)

13) Worst Week” (CBS)

14) “Samantha Who?” (ABC)

15) “How I Met Your Mother” (CBS)

Has Family Guy gone too far?

Posted on October 10th, 2008 – 2:18 PM
By Neal Justin

Greetings, fellow couch potatoes. My Sunday column this week, “Spirits in the Night,” examines how cable television is more and more willing to deal with religion, sometimes in ways that some viewers would call “irreverent.” If I had written such a column 10 years ago, I would expect my phone to ring off the hook. When shows like “The Simpsons” dealt with God, however reverently, it drew great backlash. Network attempts like “Nothing Sacred,” an excellent Kevin Anderson vehicle about a priest who - shock! - had doubts, was booted off the air due, in part, to advertising threats. But now, we’re living in different, more skeptical, more questioning times. “Family Guy” is an excellent example. It’s a show that’s as bawdy, rude, politically incorrect as anything that’s ever been on TV. Last week’s episode had Peter Griffin befriending Jesus Christ, who went on a drunken spree with Lindsay Lohan.

“Family Guy” gets away with it because A) Peter is as clueless as Archie Bunker, B) because it’s a cartoon and C) it’s an equal-opportunity offender. For me, those qualifications make it perfectly acceptable. BUt then, I’m a grown up (barely). I’m also not easily offended. My rule: If it’s funny than it’s A-OK. “Family Guy” is funny.

What was the last time something on TV really offended you? The only example I can think of is the slanted, ugly political ads being churned out by both parties right now. Talk about disgusting…

The “mustest” NBC comedies of all time

Posted on October 1st, 2008 – 12:56 PM
By Neal Justin

For the past 30 years, NBC’s Thursday-night comedy lineup has delivered to this generation much the same way CBS did on Saturdays for the last era. I’m writing about the latest effort, “Kath & Kim,” for my Sunday column (hint: It’s no “Will & Grace.” Heck, it’s not even “Jake & The Fatman”). What have been the best offerings over the past three decades? Here’s my top 10 list. Feel free to add your own:

( ) represent years the show was on Thursdays.

1) “Taxi” (1982): OK, maybe this is cheating. But the best network sitcom did technically four months on NBC’s Thursday-night lineup after ABC cancelled it. It didn’t do much better on NBC, but at least we got a few more chances to hang out with Louie, Rev. Jim, Elaine and Alex.

2) “Seinfeld” (1990-98): Second place. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

3) “Friends” (1994-2004): Yeah, it wasn’t brain surgery, but the six stars cooked up great comfort-food TV season after season.

4) “Frasier” (1993-94; 1998-2000; 2003): This five-time winner for best comedy bounced in and out of the Thursday lineup throughout its 10 season run. It never should’ve left. At least the network scheduled its 2004 finale back in its blessed spot.

5) “Will & Grace” (2000-06): The sitcom spent a few years in the farm league (Tuesday nights) before getting to play in the majors. The idea of putting together four second-bananas was a risk - and it paid off in spades.

6) “Cheers” (1982-93): This perennial favorite would ranked higher on my list if I was only considering the early seasons. I still contend that the show never recovered from the  death of Nicholas Colasanto and the departure of Shelley Long, left to lean way too hard on sexual innuendos.

7) “The Office” (2006-  ): Of the current batch, Steve Carell and company slip ahead of the unevenness of both “My Name is Earl” and “30 Rock.”

8) “The Cosby Show” (1984-92): More important for what it represented than for what it was. Cosby deserves all the credit for reenergizing the format and proving that all Americans would watch a black family that didn’t rely on shuck-jive antics. I only wish it would have funnier.

9) “Family Ties” (1984-89): All hail Michael….Gross.

10. “Scrubs” (?????): Tracking how many times “Scrubs” has moved in and out of Thursday’s lineup is too taxing. It will start mid-season on ABC - but don’t ask us which night.