Norm Coleman

Coleman’s text: ‘We need uniters not dividers’

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., today launched his reelection campaign with a rally and speech at his St. Paul headquarters.

Here are his prepared remarks. (For a speech delivered Tuesday by Democratic candidate Al Franken, see this McMemo post.)

Coleman’s text:

My face and my name are familiar. But there are some things most people don’t know. I have lived in the same house on a quiet St. Paul street for 20 years. We send Sarah to college in the fall; at the same time Jake heads to the U of M law school.

Like families on every street we’ve had to empty out part of our retirement plans to pay for our kids’ education and support elderly parents.

And a few months ago we laid my dad to rest in Arlington Cemetery. He was a man of boundless enthusiasm and love. This is the first big step of my life I’ve taken without him by my side.

But his spirit encourages every beat of my heart today and I honor him by trying to serve with every ounce of energy God gives me.

I am very conscious of the fact that I stand between two generations: trying to honor the values and sacrifice of my Dad’s generation and working to create even greater opportunities for the world my kids will grow old in.

I respect and believe in public service as a high calling. As my favorite legendary mayor Joe Soucheray says, you don’t do it to be important; you do it to be useful. Public service is not about celebrity; it’s about problem-solving. And politics only has value if it leads to progress. We’ve made progress in the last six years in a challenging world. And we can do even more.

These past few years we’ve accomplished a lot for our state and our country. But America is a race without a finish line, and Minnesota is a leading participant in that race. After 150 years, we’re just getting started.

Proud of our past and eager to reach for our common future, I am humbled and excited to announce: today I am a candidate for another term as your senator.

I want to say right up front that I run for this office as a proud Republican because this party expresses and achieves the highest ideals of America.

Republicans believe in freedom first, and government programs after.

We believe in a strong national defense and an unshakeable relationship with our ally Israel. We should never go to the UN for a permission slip to pursue our national interest.

Republicans are for small businesses (especially those who pay their workers’ comp insurance) and we’re for the entrepreneur, not big media, big business, trial lawyers or any other special interest.

We are for quality jobs for working men and women.

We are for the family farm.

We are for the free exercise of faith.

We are for strengthening the family,

We are for limited, effective government.

And we are for protecting all life, from the moment of conception to natural death.

And we welcome to this campaign all those who decide, like I did, that they want to pursue their American ideals above and beyond partisan politics.

Now we all know these are challenging times. Our economy has slowed. Our politics are divided. And our families are stressed. My wife and kids and I enjoy our lives, but we open the morning paper with the same anxiety all of you do. What’s going to happen today?

But life is more than emotion and history is more than circumstance. The ancient Hebrew prophets said without a vision the people perish. It is our common belief in a better future that helps us survive and prevail.

It is the task of leadership to define and nurture that vision.

That is almost reason enough for me to run for re-election: to be a voice of optimism in a cynical time.

If we as Minnesotans don’t believe we can succeed, then we are probably right. But I’m here to say I believe in Minnesota’s and America’s bright future.

Optimism is not a republican virtue, or democrat virtue; it’s an American virtue. Optimism is more than a feeling, it’s an approach.

It’s a way of seeing obstacles as opportunities; it’s an ability to turn challenges into chances for greatness. America’s greatness and Minnesota’s also - comes from our ability to summon optimism and hope when the facts seem to point to despair and defeat.

Our economy is hurting; folks are losing their homes and worried about the cost of their health care.

We have reached such a time when we really, really need to draw about our resilient spirit of confidence and our unified capability for action, and move our nation forward.

My heroes are hopeful people:

David Ben Gurion who said, “Anyone who doesn’t believe in miracles is not a realist.”

Ronald Reagan, who talked about the song the settlers sang as they pushed west, “It is the American sound… hopeful, big-hearted, idealistic, daring, decent, and fair.”

And Helen Keller, who said: “Security in this life is an illusion… life is either a daring adventure or it is nothing at all.”

I love my country and I love Minnesota… Because we are perfect? No. Because unlike other places on this globe, we always find the motivation to rise above circumstances and end up better than where we began.

The events of 2007 say more about MN than any politician ever could about what kind of place we are: we had floods, fires, droughts and the bridge collapse, and yet our people and their government stepped forward and met those extreme challenges one by one. Minnesotans refused to quit or to whine or become victims. We chose to be neighbors instead.

We didn’t just survive, we prevailed; we’re not just moving on, we’re moving forward. We didn’t just find a way out, we found our way together.

We are part of a proud history. In his message to the Congress of 1862, Lincoln called America “the last best hope of earth.”

He said that at a time when millions remained in slavery, the Civil War was claiming thousands of lives each month and terrible economic hardships were weighing on the people.

And yet he was full of the kind of optimism that sustains and leads.

In a small, local way, I know something about this from personal experience. I became mayor of Saint Paul, in a dark time. Jobs were leaving, crime was growing and taxes were rising. By the time I completed eight years of no tax increases, of eight years of making our capital city more livable and affordable for middle class families: thousands of new jobs were added; billions of dollars were invested in reconnecting with our Mississippi River and we brought the National Hockey League back to Minnesota-where it always belonged.

As a mayor I simply brought people together to work very hard to get things done for our city. We didn’t point fingers, we joined hands. We softened our voices and we lifted our sights. That is my experience, my pattern and my approach to governing during 32 years of public service in Minnesota.

With Norm Coleman, bringing people together to get things done is what you see and what you get.

I am running on my record, because unlike my likely opponent, I have one. What a concept: before you serve in the U.S. Senate, maybe you should have done something to show you can actually do the job.

In my 17 years with the Minnesota attorney general’s office, I traveled to every corner of this great state prosecuting criminals

As mayor, I helped rebuild a capital city that we could all be proud of.

As your Senator I’ve tried to be “Minnesota’s mayor in Washington”: putting the emphasis on serving your needs, no project too big or too small. I’m willing to work with anybody who helps get the job done. I learned a long time ago that there are some problems that are too big for one party to solve.

I’ve visited all 87 counties at least twice, listening and learning what you need from your national government. My staff and I have been to every single City in this state over 800 - large, small and in between. We’re not looking for a medal: that’s our job.

I’ve been a champion for ending our dependence on foreign oil with renewable fuels, wind energy, clean coal technology, nuclear energy and deep water drilling.

And I kept my promises to Minnesotans. I said I’d oppose drilling in ANWR and I did.

I said I’d support or troops and our veterans and I did. I succeeded in improving health care for our veteran’s and securing funding for a national “made in Minnesota” model for reintegrating our brave troops coming home from Iraq.

And so much more:

I’ve worked to increase low income heating assistance for the poor and fought cuts in service to the most vulnerable Minnesotan’s.

I’ve championed rural development and worked to insure that the quality of health care doesn’t depend on your zip code.

As Chair of the Permanent Investigation subcommittee I uncovered $14 billion in wasteful Washington spending.

I blew the lid off the corruption of the Oil for Food Program that financed Saddam’s terror at our expense.

I’ve held millionaires and corporate America accountable by exposing sham tax shelters-and brought billions of tax dollars back into the U.S. treasury.

I worked with the our Minnesota delegation, the administration, the governor and local officials to fund the new I-35W bridge that is already rising from the river as symbol of recovery and progress.

We helped over 3,000 Minnesotan’s secure passports after the system collapsed-and that nightmare will never occur again, because we’ve brought a passport office to Minnesota next year.

I worked to protect our ports so we can have greater security that terrorists aren’t smuggling-in nuclear weapons.

I have worked with family farmers on disaster assistance, and helped break the log jam that was preventing passage of the critically needed farm bill for Minnesota.

I said I’d help bring seniors a drug benefit under Medicare and I did. I said I’d support good judges, who interpret the Constitution, not reinvent it, and I did and they’re making wise decisions that protect this country and foster freedom.

I could go on and on, and during this campaign, I will! … about all that has been accomplished, but there is so much more we need to do.

At a time like this, when national partisanship is so inflamed, we need uniters not dividers.

And when its all said and done, after all the bills, all the hearings and the votes, I would say what matters most to me are the people I’ve been able to help.

I met Pete Panos here, over in Iraq, when he was a member of the famous Red Bulls, the greatest National Guard unit in America.

Now he advises me on how we provide support for all veterans. After listening to Pete and many other Minnesota veterans, I personally spoke to Secretary Gates and helped guarantee full education benefits for all of our troops who served in Iraq.

I pushed for GI bill education benefits for spouses who had to quit school to care for their families when their spouses were on 15 month tours of duty. And we just recently, for the first time in over 30 years raised the mileage reimbursement for vets traveling to VA facilities for health care. Pete, we thank you for your service.

Joe and Linda Goleski here had in their hearts the hope of adopting a baby from Guatemala. They were caught in a bureaucratic nightmare.

As Linda put it, “Until you’ve been alone in a foreign country, with a new baby, and no one to be your advocate, you have no idea how scary the experience can be.”

We became their advocate, leaned hard on the Guatemalan government and they brought baby, Sophia, home to be a Minnesotan.

And Sergeant Tom Shilling is with us here today, too.

Tom went through the military process to get a two week leave from Iraq to be at his daughter’s wedding.

It was all approved — until his commanding officer tore it up. We were on the phone in 5 minute intervals for hours to get someone on the line with the authority to fix it.

It was small joy to us and huge one to him when he arrived with 24 hours to spare and walked his daughter down the aisle. Thanks for your service, Tom and for the chance to serve you.

Friends, it’s not labels or speeches that matter: it’s people. Protecting their freedom and creating policies that serve them.

I’m fighting for the people’s interests, not the special interests.

The soldiers, the elderly, the college kids, the middle class and the working families–these are the people who deserve a senator who fights for them-and has shown he can produce results.

I have, I am, and with your help in November, I will for years to come.

I was born a long way from here. But 32 years ago I made a choice that gave me the incredible opportunity to lead a Minnesota life.

My heart brought me to this place to marry the woman who stands with me in this adventure. Our love brought me the two beautiful children who stand with us today as young adults.

Over those three decades I’ve experienced the joys of fishing on crystal clear Minnesota lakes, celebrating two baseball world championships-and dropping the puck at the first game of the Minnesota Wild.

I’ve also faced difficulties and heartbreaks here. Laurie and I buried our first son Adam and our youngest daughter Grace in the good earth of Minnesota.

But our grief gave us a greater love for the sanctity of all human life.

Through it all, the spirit of family and faith that is so strong in this state has sustained me.

I’ve never lost the sense of hope and optimism that this is the land of 10,000 dreams and daily miracles in the lives of regular people.

Minnesota is a place that respects hard work, common sense and public service. That’s the Minnesota I want to continue to work for in the uncertain future that we face.

For limited, effective government that lives within its means.

For success in Iraq and then an orderly withdrawal.

For affordable health care for all Minnesotan’s, without turning it over to the government folks who did Katrina relief and the welfare programs that ruined so many.

For tax cuts, less regulation and free and fair trade, not a clumsy, inflexible and intrusive government and protectionism.

For a judiciary that respects the Constitution and traditional values, and not one that tries to govern through social experimentation from the bench.

I see beyond today’s cloudy horizon to a bright American future.

I’m not willing to cede the 21st Century to the Chinese or anyone else. That’s because I will work hard to make sure we have the smartest kids, the best trained workers and a dynamic economy based on our unlimited entrepreneurial spirit.

I see a bold new American technology leading the way to the next stage of global economic growth.

I especially see new green technology creating robust new 21st century job opportunities as we fulfill our commitments to clean the air, the water and the land we hold so dear in the Land of 10,000 lakes.

I see citizen engagement, market principles and innovative government solving our problems in health care, housing, energy and education.

I see the march of freedom continuing over the rocky road of terrorism and totalitarianism to a better future for all.

And I see Minnesota and Minnesotans leading the way in all of these areas.

Lincoln closed that famous message to Congress I quoted earlier with these words, talking about the unique American pathway through trouble: “The way is plain, peaceful, generous, just — a way which, if followed, the world will forever applaud, and God must forever bless.”

That’s the path of public service for me: plain - not Hollywood; peaceful - not divisive; generous - not mean spirited; and just - not political.

Isn’t that what we all want? Republicans, Democrats and Independents?

As Minnesotans, there is so much more that unites us than divides us. This campaign isn’t about me…it’s about you — your families, your dreams, your future. That’s why I asked to be your senator six years ago. And that’s why I ask you today to let me continue the job.

Together, we can make a great state even greater and a proud country even prouder.

Let me repeat something I said when I first sought this office six years ago. In the Bible it says that those who have been faithful in little things will be entrusted with greater things.

I have learned a lot in all my experiences in public service - from both my successes and my mistakes.

I would say with honest humility, I think what I do best is what Minnesota needs most: an experienced, optimistic problem-solver who can do more than talk about change: I can actually bring people together to get things done for Minnesota.

As Americans, we are the last best hope of earth: let’s rise above lesser things and make our parents proud and our children grateful.

May God continue bless America and the State of Minnesota as we work to be worthy of that blessing.

And may God bless you all.

Coleman to launch reelection campaign

Monday, March 24th, 2008

Until now, Sen. Norm Coleman has waged a reelection campaign remotely — mostly through press releases and Web videos. This week, he takes to the streets.

On Wednesday, Coleman officially launches his campaign with a rally, followed by a three-day tour around the state and another day attending GOP congressional district conventions.

Not willing to cede the spotlight, Democrat Al Franken announced this morning that on Tuesday he’ll hold a rally, announce “exciting new endorsements and deliver a major speech defining the issues of this campaign.” That event will be in the State Capitol Rotunda at 10:30 a.m.

The Coleman tour begins at his campaign headquarters, 680 Transfer Rd., St Paul, at 9:30 a.m. Wednesday. Later in the day he stops in Rochester, Duluth and Moorhead. Thursday’s schedule brings him to Fergus Falls, Alexandria and St. Cloud. On Friday, he make six stops — in Shakopee, St. Peter, Mankato, Waseca, Owatonna and Albert Lea. (The time and location of each stop can be found in the Coming Up feature on Politically Connected, www.startribune.com/politics.

On Saturday, he attends congressional district endorsing coventions in Albert Lea (First District), Northfield (Second District) and Hibbing (Eighth District).

The other major candidate in the race, Democrat Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, has a Friday night event on his public schedule — holding a campaign house party in Minneapolis. (Details in Coming Up.)

Coleman, Klobuchar job approval

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

About half of Minnesotans approve of the job Sen. Norm Coleman is doing as senator, according to a new poll.

The Survey USA poll taken Feb. 15-17 and released today, found that the Republican Coleman’s job approval rating was at 49 percent.

The poll of 600 adults, sponsored by KSTP-TV, and Austin-based KAAL and Duluth-based WDIO, did not measure support for Coleman’s DFL opponents, led by Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, Mike Ciresi and Al Franken.

Norm_Coleman_2.jpg

Coleman’s approval rating is about the same as it was in the Survey USA poll last month (51 percent, and both polls had margins of sampling error of about 4 percentage points). His rating is up from the summer, when he hit a low of 43 percent job approval in the poll.

The new poll also found that Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar’s job approval is 61 percent — unchanged since the January poll.

A future role for Sen. Coleman?

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

This report was filed by Washington Correspondent Nina Petersen-Perlman.

Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call is reporting that U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman’s name is being tossed around as a potential new chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee for the 2009-2010 term, assuming he retains his seat in the 2008 election.

The committee head is elected for a two-year term by the Republican Senate caucus to travel the country, soliciting donations, supporting candidates facing election and recruiting candidates. Sen. John Ensign (Nev.), the current chairman, “sees no scenario where he will run for the NRSC Chair again,” said NRSC Spokesman Rebecca Fisher.

Coleman ran for the job in 2006 but lost by one vote to Elizabeth Dole (N.C.).

Coleman’s office is staying mum on whether he would consider taking another shot at it, saying that he is focusing all his energy on the upcoming election.“(He) has taken no steps toward chairing the NRSC in the future,” said Press Secretary LeRoy Coleman.

NRSC spokeswoman Rebecca Fisher would not confirm that the Minnesota senator is on their short list for leadership, calling it “speculation.”

Or you could get him a tie

Friday, December 14th, 2007

This priceless political fundraising pitch was forwarded to me by colleague Howard Sinker.

It’s an e-mail from Gayle Kagen, wife of Wisconsin Democratic Congressman Steve Kagen: “I’m so proud of my husband…Steve’s 58th birthday is this week. It would be a wonderful gift for Steve to see how many people are behind him and want to keep him in Congress by sending a birthday donation to his re-election campaign fund.”

Don’t you think Steve would be just as touched if you sent him a tie, or even a musical greeting card? And by the way, don’t breathe a word of this to him; I’m sure Gayle thought this up and sent out the e-mail all by herself.

You’ll be happy to know that, if you send a check, Gayle will allow you to do this, too: “You can also include a note of thanks with your donation if you wish.”

While I’m at it, here’s a snippet from a recent fundraising appeal from Republican Sen. Norm Coleman, who relies on the tried and true approach of hoping to cash in by raising the spectre of his opponent — Democrat Al Franken — actually winning:

“You see, Franken is trying to clean up his act. Reinvent himself. He’s cut down on the profanity. Instead of cussing out Republicans he now calls for bipartisanship. Instead of crude jokes about political opponents, he talks civility.

“Liberal donors from across the country get the joke. They know that, if elected, the venomous, deeply partisan Al Franken they know and love will come out on the floor of the U.S. Senate.”

If you have fundraising e-mails or letters that you’re particularly fond of, by all means share them here — or send them to me as the campaign wears on. You can e-mail them to PoliticallyConnected@startribune.com, or mail them to:

Dennis McGrath
Editor, Politically Connected
Minneapolis Star Tribune
425 Portland Ave.
Minneapolis, MN. 55488

Farm subsidies have deep political roots

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

Corn. Cotton. Sugar. Rice.

Name a crop and, it seems, there’s a government subsidy or protective tariff for it.

The much-denounced system of ag supports is about to be renewed in Congress, and it’s a pretty safe bet that any changes to the heart of the program will be minimal.

Amy_Klobuchar_AP.jpg
Sen. Amy Klobuchar

Today, our Washington correspondents, Kevin Diaz and Nina Petersen-Perlman, write about the latest effort to trim it back. You can read their story here. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D), is trying to limit government payments to farmers with more than $750,000 in adjusted gross income, arguing that the program currently provides subsidies to people who don’t need them.

“Right now nearly 600 residents of New York City, 559 residents of Washington, DC, and even 21 residents of Beverly Hills 90210 have received federal farm checks in the past three years,” she said last month in a Senate speech. Here’s her full statement.

The Environmental Working Group has been leading the way in calling attention to all the urban “suits” receiving farm subsidies — from athletes to millionaire corporate CEOs. The EWG has done great work making the data accessibile.

For example, I found that 250 people in my decidedly suburban Minnetonka zip code have received farm subsidies totalling more than $3 million from 1995-2005. You can search the database here. And you can find the EWG home page here.

Here’s the Heritage Foundation’s analysis of what’s wrong with the Senate farm bill, and how to improve it.

Sen._Norm_Coleman.jpg
Sen. Norm Coleman

Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., takes up the defense of the subsidy system, saying the actions of foreign governments makes U.S. subsidies necessary.

“Why do our farm families need a safety net at all? The answer, in part, lies with a world market that is today neither free nor fair. For example, when the world looks at America, it sees U.S. tariffs averaging about 12%. Meanwhile, when American farm families looks at the world, they see an average tariff of about 62% — or 5 times as much.” The rest of Coleman’s statement on agriculture issues can be found here.

And here’s an argument by Diggers Realm that the subsidies are valuable as a homeland security effort.

The dispute over farm subsidies is, of course, not limited to the domestic political arena. It’s a global battle. A few years back, the British Guardian newspaper gave birth to an organization called kickAAS — Kick All Agricultural Subsidies. Here’s the kickAAS site.

The U.S. farm lobby has gotten smaller over the years, as there are fewer but larger farm operations. But the lobby has retained its clout, at least in part because agriculture — whether grain, livestock, cotton, vegetable, fruit or dairy production — is an important industry in virtually every state. It’s no surprise, for example, that the major presidential candidates are not campaigning to end farm subsidies — not with the Iowa caucuses coming up.

What do you think? Is the income limit on full-time farmers that Klobuchar is suggesting a reasonable one? Or could it, as Coleman argues, fracture the coalition of farm interests trying to get the farm bill passed? Do you prefer his plan to direct the reform at “part-time” farmers?

The latest word(s) on Paulose

Tuesday, November 20th, 2007

After Rachel Paulose’s resignation as U.S. Attorney for Minnesota yesterday, the Left celebrated and blamed the Bush administration for a politically-grounded appointment that was bound to fail.

The Right blamed her departure on a media lynching.

And a non-partisan, offering a more temperate view, blamed it on the common mistakes of an inexperienced supervisor.

Here’s a sample of what the bloggers had to say last night and this morning.

Rachel_Paulose.jpg
U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose

TPMmuckraker
“It’s not a promotion — it’s a way out.”

TalkLeft:
“Now, how hard was that? Should have been done months ago.”

Norwegianity:
“Only with the Bushies do failures fall upwards. Pathetic.”

Power Line’s Scott Johnson, a friend of Paulose, reacting to an early StarTribune.com story about her resignation:
“Let’s see. She’s a Republican. (The position of United States Attorney is a political appointmet.) She was appointed to the position by the Bush administration. (No one other than the president and the Attorney General had the legal authority to make the appointment.) She knew Monica Goodling. (Liberals used to oppose guilty by association.) And former United States Attorney Tom Heffelfinger might have been fired if he had not resigned when he did. I understand completely.”

Lazy Gopher Pachyderm blames the media and Sen. Norm Coleman for abandoning her:
“Minnesota Republicans’ own wind-tossed strand of boiled linguini, U.S. Senator Norm Coleman, abandoned Rachel Paulose, his successful nominee for the U.S. attorney’s office in St. Paul. Bowing to unsubstantiated, even false media speculation, Coleman pulled his support, which I’m guessing is what likely led to the end of her tenure in St. Paul.”

Indiablogs:
“After the New York Times hatchet job on Rachel Paulose last week, we never had any doubt that her departure was imminent.”

Mark Cohen at Minnesota Lawyer blog says that Paulose is smart, charming, conservative in belief but not political in how she ran the office. He says she was neither the Wicked Witch her detractors claimed nor the St. Rachel that conservatives held her up to be:
“It has always been my belief that it was a management situation causing the disruptions at the office. Paulose has sterling academic credentials and a highly impressive resume for her age. But she had little real management experience.

“Intent on impressing her bosses and no doubt believing in her priorities, she plowed ahead and redirected the office without getting buy-in from the troops. She was also reportedly sometimes dictatorial in manner and abrasive toward subordinates. These are rookie mistake frequently made by inexperienced managers. But when that manager is in charge of 100 talented individuals at the U.S. Attorney’s Office and operating in a fishbowl, there is little room for error.”

What’s your analysis?

Senate race a dead heat

Monday, November 5th, 2007

A new poll shows Sen. Norm Coleman in a dead heat with Al Franken and Mike Ciresi, the two leading Democratic candidates.

Here’s the poll, taken by SurveyUSA for Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper.

The poll has Coleman at 46 percent when matched against Franken, who has 45 percent. Against Ciresi, Coleman gets 44 percent and Ciresi gets 44 percent.

Other hightlights:

The favorable ratings for all three candidates are low. Coleman’s favorable and unfavorable ratings are about even; Franken’s unfavorables are much higher than his favorables; and Ciresi is still struggling to make himself known.

The gender gap is significant. Coleman runs 11 points better among men than among women vs. Franken. And Coleman runs 15 points better among men than women vs. Ciresi.

Here’s a look back at the Star Tribune’s Minnesota Poll taken in September, which included Coleman job approval and candidate image questions, but no horse-race questions.

Senate race: the bloggers’ view

Thursday, November 1st, 2007

Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race is being watched closely by many outside Minnesota. Here’s a look at what bloggers beyond our borders are saying.

Al Franken

Al_Franken_mug.jpg
Al Franken

The Texas Liberal blog reports from inside Franken’s fundraiser in Houston recently. Besides recounting what Franken had to say — he described himself as the likely DFL nominee; he’ll fight aggressively against negative attacks; and he likes meeting people — Texas Liberal tells how to get into a $500 fundraiser for a mere $50.

Brendan Nyhan takes Franken to task for suggesting that the government levy fines for lying on the airwaves, arguing that Franken’s position would silence speech and target political minorities.

This link on Propeller.com — to a recent story in The Nation – led to a lively exchange, with views on Franken ranging from he’ll lose because he projects an air of intellectual superiority to he’ll have so much hilarious material to work with as a senator that he’ll make C-SPAN worth watching.

Norm Coleman
Coleman’s vote in committee Wednesday against the Law of the Sea treaty landed him in some blogs yesterday. The Citizens for Global Solutions pointed out in a blog posting that of the four “no” votes, “the biggest surprise was Coleman, who voted in favor of the treaty in 2004.” It goes on to say that “substance means little to Coleman, who was John Bolton’s strongest supporter in confirmation hearings during the last Congress.” The treaty is opposed by some who argue that it cedes U.S. sovereignty to the United Nations and an international commission.

Norm_Coleman_2.jpg
Sen. Norm Coleman

THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS reports on Coleman’s recent speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition in Washington and includes this tribute to him: “Whether it is the War on Terror or a collapsing bridge, Norm Coleman gets the big picture. His toughness is mixed with a significant amount of warmth. He is a genuinely kind man, and he was truly beloved in the room.” The blogger also offers Coleman a line he can use that equates Democrats with Minnesota Vikings on a party boat. Coleman laughs (but I don’t think you’ll be hearing Coleman use the line himself).

Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer
Nelson-Pallmeyer got a plug in the Citizens for Global Solutions blog posting about the Law of the Sea Treaty (see above). It added an update to the item about Coleman, noting that Nelson-Pallmeyer “is the first of Coleman’s challengers out of the gate to point out this massive and as-yet-unexplained flip flop.”

Nelson-Pallmeyer also earned a mention in the Lonely Candidate, which tracks instances in which candidates who claim to be the only one who (fill-in-the-blank). It cited this quote from Nelson-Pallmeyer: “I’m the only candidate in this race who has a hyphenated last name.”

Jack_Nelson_Pallmeyer.jpg
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer

Mike Ciresi
Ciresi received a passing plug in a Rhode Island’s Future blog item about Franken appearing at the Blue State Coffee shop in Providence. Matt Jerzyk says, “I actually like the other Democrat in the race - Mike Ciresi - as much as Franken.” That’s as far as the praise goes, but there you have it.

Ciresi_better_mug.jpg
Mike Ciresi

On Daily Kos, The Big E writes about how the Iraq war is playing in the race. Ciresi has been jabbing at Franken for supporting the war at the outset. The Big E shoot back that while Ciresi opposed the war at the outset, he didn’t do much to act on his opposition. He adds: “Which leads me to one critical point about Mike Ciresi in comparison to Al Franken. Ciresi hasn’t done much in the last five years.”

Jim Cohen
Cohen is another Democratic challenger, but when he shows up in non-Minnesota blogs, the posting is not about him. He’s just mentioned as another candidate. If anyone knows of non-Minnesota posts about him, please add them.

Open skulduggery in Senate race

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

A blog posting about Al Franken campaign appearances offers a peek into the spying that politicos routinely conduct on each other — completely above board.

This headline appears (as of this moment) on the Politically Connected page for Al Franken, where we draw in the latest news stories and blog postings about the candidate: “MN GOP “TRACKER” DENIED ADMISSION TO PUBLIC EVENTS OF AL FRANKEN.”

Al_Franken_mug.jpg
Al Franken

The post is from Minnesota Democrats Exposed (MDE), and it said that the Republican operative who follows Al Franken around at public events has been “denied access to numerous public events where Al Franken is scheduled to appear.”

The post, by Michael Brodkorb, explains that this is a common practice by both parties. He links to a previous posting he did, noting that “J.D. from Franken’s campaign” attended and videotaped a recent Republican press conference critical of Franken.

The campaigns routinely send operatives — sometimes volunteers, sometimes paid staffers — to their opponent’s events. Videocam in hand, they capture every utterance — and every slip of the tongue — and the “highlights” are sure to show up in TV ads down the road.

The campaigns even get to know the tracker assigned to them.

Franken’s campaign refers to one GOP operative that followed the Democrat this summer as “Tracker Pete.” But Tracker Pete is now back at school in Duluth, said Franken spokesman Andy Barr.

“J.P. is the new guy,” Barr said.

“J.P. and some other people,” Republican Party spokesman Mark Drake added helpfully.

“This is the game, it’s politics. It happens on both sides of the aisle,” agreed Kelly Schwinghammer, the DFL Party communications director.

The GOP’s Drake, asked about the posting on MDE, cited three instances when the GOP tracker was turned away: A labor-union event in which Franken worked alongside a health care worker for a day; a luncheon; and an appearance before the Macalester College Democrats.

Drake acknowledged that the Franken campaign may not have directly organized and controlled all the events. But he said that Franken’s appearance at them was publicly advertised, including in at least one case on Franken’s website, giving it the imprint of a Franken campaign event. He said that if Franken’s campaign is committed to openness, it should have taken “one minute” in advance to “work with the organizers to allow admission to Republicans.”

Norm_Coleman_2.jpg
Sen. Norm Coleman

Barr said he’s not aware of a single time the Franken campaign has turned a tracker away from an event they had control over, and said that trackers are welcome at their events. He said that Drake was setting an “unreasonable standard” in expecting the Franken campaign to instruct organizers to admit trackers to events that Franken is simply invited to himself.

The DFL’s Schwinghammer said that their trackers have been turned away from a handful of events involving Sen. Norm Coleman, since they started tracking him in August.

The MDE posting drew an interesting comment from Jason, who wrote: “I was at a DFL event. A person, from the GOP I guess, was there with a video camera. This person was younger and seemed naive and inexperienced. She was asked nicely to leave and she did. She probably didn’t have to legally but she did anyway. Does this mean she was ‘denied’ access? Or was she simply too timid?”

Barr, from the Franken campaign, extened this courtsey to the GOP’s Drake. The luncheon event that the tracker was denied access to was videotaped, and the Franken website has a link to it on its home page.

“If Mark needs the link, I’ll be happy to send it to him.”

No need for that. Here it is.

What standards should apply to how campaigns handle trackers? Are there otherwise public events that they should be banned from?