<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Bill James suggest &#8216;87, &#8216;91 Twins tainted by steroids?</title>
	<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: studes</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39858</link>
		<dc:creator>studes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39858</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We have not read the book, but we’ll trust the account.&lt;/i&gt;

Why would you trust the account.  The writer of that headline obviously doesn't understand what irony and sarcasm are.  This is a big brouhaha about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We have not read the book, but we’ll trust the account.</i></p>
<p>Why would you trust the account.  The writer of that headline obviously doesn&#8217;t understand what irony and sarcasm are.  This is a big brouhaha about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGreg</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39849</link>
		<dc:creator>JGreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39849</guid>
		<description>Used to be the Twins were all Hamm's guys.  I still think TC is the Hamm's Beer Bear in disguise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used to be the Twins were all Hamm&#8217;s guys.  I still think TC is the Hamm&#8217;s Beer Bear in disguise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39848</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39848</guid>
		<description>There's no way Hrbek would be caught dead drinking a Schmidt, he drank PBR or Grain Belt and that was it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way Hrbek would be caught dead drinking a Schmidt, he drank PBR or Grain Belt and that was it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39847</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39847</guid>
		<description>"Unless Pabst Blue Ribbon is a PED I think the Twins were clean."

I think Hrbek, Gaetti, and Brunasky were Schmidt guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unless Pabst Blue Ribbon is a PED I think the Twins were clean.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Hrbek, Gaetti, and Brunasky were Schmidt guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39845</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39845</guid>
		<description>Unless Pabst Blue Ribbon is a PED I think the Twins were clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Pabst Blue Ribbon is a PED I think the Twins were clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraightCashHomey</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39844</link>
		<dc:creator>StraightCashHomey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39844</guid>
		<description>And Gaetti was also no longer a Twin in '91.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Gaetti was also no longer a Twin in &#8216;91.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39843</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39843</guid>
		<description>Didn't both titles come before the advent of HGH and PEDs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t both titles come before the advent of HGH and PEDs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraightCashHomey</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39842</link>
		<dc:creator>StraightCashHomey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39842</guid>
		<description>I choose to believe that "rotund" is not the type of shape that steroids put one in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I choose to believe that &#8220;rotund&#8221; is not the type of shape that steroids put one in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughkat</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39839</link>
		<dc:creator>roughkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/04/04/did-bill-james-suggest-87-91-twins-tainted-by-steroids/#comment-39839</guid>
		<description>Obviously not worth a discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously not worth a discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
