StarTribune.com

Gingrich support of Favre flies in face of Contract With America

Posted on July 16th, 2008 – 11:30 AM
By Michael Rand

gingrich.jpgJust when you thought the Brett Favre saga couldn’t get any weirder, Newt Gingrich entered the ring with a plea to the Packers to bring back the ol’ Gunslinger. You can watch video — where else? — on Greta Van Susteren’s web site. Deadspin has done us the kind service of finding a more substantial effort from Newt. After the jump? A point-by-point examination of how it conflicts with the 1994 Gingrich-led Republican Contract With America. But now, current Newt:

A Plea From Two Packers Fans — Paul Lubbers is my son-in-law, but we share more than family ties. He’s also a fellow shareholder in the Green Bay Packers. And as responsible shareholders, we – like many of those invested in the Green & Gold - feel compelled to speak out on the turmoil surrounding the return of Brett Favre to the NFL and whether or not he should wear Packer’s uniform.

Should Favre have taken some time (like he did the past few years) to rest, recover and reclaim some perspective? Yes. Did he make a bad decision to retire? Also Yes. Should Ted Thompson and the Packers welcome him back to Packers family? Absolutely!!

For the last 16 years, football fans have all had the opportunity to watch Favre display his many gifts as a quarterback, breaking every NFL record, and leading the Packers to the playoffs 11 times during his tenure. His performance last year proved beyond a doubt that he can still play.

I understand that the Packers have made plans to build the offense around Aaron Rodgers, but plans are made to change. And in this case the Packers should adjust their plans quickly to bring back Favre. Can you imagine Favre as a Viking or even worse a Chicago Bear?

The fact is Brett Favre made a bad decision, kind of like when he throws one of his record-setting interceptions. Now it is the Packers turn to change their mind and put the ball back in Favre’s hands, so that he can again throw some more record setting touchdowns wearing Packer Green & Gold.

And how does this wacky sentiment compare with the 10 components of the Contract With America? Oh, this should be fun.

1. THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out- of-control Congress, requiring them to live under the same budget constraints as families and businesses. We say: Is it fiscally responsible to pay two quarterbacks an absurd amount of money? Is it responsible to blow up your salary cap to appease the whims of one man? We think not, Newt.

2. THE TAKING BACK OUR STREETS ACT: An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in- sentencing, “good faith” exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer’s “crime” bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools. We say: Nobody, particularly the citizens of Wisconsin, is safe as long as Favre is allowed to carry out these shenanigans.

3. THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: Discourage illegitimacy and teen pregnancy by prohibiting welfare to minor mothers and denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, cut spending for welfare programs, and enact a tough two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility. We say: Personal responsibility. Tough love, Brett. You made your bed. Time to pull yourself up by the bootstraps, son, and move on.

4. THE FAMILY REINFORCEMENT ACT: Child support enforcement, tax incentives for adoption, strengthening rights of parents in their children’s education, stronger child pornography laws, and an elderly dependent care tax credit to reinforce the central role of families in American society. We say: Favre is tearing apart so many football-loving families.

5. THE AMERICAN DREAM RESTORATION ACT: A $500 per child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle class tax relief. We say: What about Aaron Rodgers’ American Dream?

6. THE NATIONAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT: No U.S. troops under U.N. command and restoration of the essential parts of our national security funding to strengthen our national defense and maintain our credibility around the world. We say: If the goal is maintaining credibility, we’d say the Good Ship Favre sailed a long time ago.

7. THE SENIOR CITIZENS FAIRNESS ACT: Raise the Social Security earnings limit which currently forces seniors out of the work force, repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security benefits and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance to let Older Americans keep more of what they have earned over the years. We say: This is actually consistent with Favre’s situation.

8. THE JOB CREATION AND WAGE ENHANCEMENT ACT: Small business incentives, capital gains cut and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages. We say: Brett Favre takes jobs away from Americans.

9. THE COMMON SENSE LEGAL REFORM ACT: “Loser pays” laws, reasonable limits on punitive damages and reform of product liability laws to stem the endless tide of litigation. We say: Common sense is not a common thread in any of this Favre mess.

10. THE CITIZEN LEGISLATURE ACT: A first-ever vote on term limits to replace career politicians with citizen legislators. We say: Everyone’s time must come, Brett. Even Newt could see that 14 years ago.

18 Responses to "Gingrich support of Favre flies in face of Contract With America"

Jon says:

July 16th, 2008 at 11:45 am

True story: Newt Gingrich is terrified of children.

(Insert Mark Chmura joke here)

Stu says:

July 16th, 2008 at 11:49 am

Words fail, except to note that Newt Gingrich is a douchebag’s douchebag.

Brandon says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

I have a tough time seeing eye-to-eye with anyone who uses double exclamation points. Seriously!!

Clarence Swamptown says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

Newt would also like to note that Barack Obama wanted Favre to retire before last season. Once Favre proved to be effective, Obama ‘refined’ his Favre policy and now believes that while Brett should retire sometime in the near future, he currently creates a more sound and secure Packer team.

Merx says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:28 pm

This discussion is to political for me, all I have to say is Favre needs to go back to Mississippi and stay there.

muxhut says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

I’m seeking suggestions on avoiding discussing this issue.

Last night some friends were supporting my alcoholism, and after discussing the HomeRunDerby fiasco (which put me into a bad mood) one of them decided to offer up Favre as a discussion topic. I answered “Nah, I don’t really want to talk about that, it’s dumb…” but unfortunately I didn’t come up with an optional topic quick enough, because the token ‘Sconi in our group immediately launched into her opinions of the matter.

So. What are some less likely-to-make-me-punch-you topics that I should have thrown out? Better yet, does anyone have a quick-rejoinder to this topic that would make everyone want to avoid discussing it?

StraightCashHomey says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

Brandon: What if it’s completed with a smiley face? Then it’s cool, right?!!

Merx says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

muxhut: No one has brought up the all-star game yet. What if they allow players to re-enter the game if the games extends to the 15th?

muxhut says:

July 16th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Merx (kudos on 1/2 of your letters, by the way) - although that discussion would not have applied well last night as we left the bar before the 7th inning, yes I like it, despite it’s association with the HDR.

The problem as I see it arises from two things:
1) The fact that most All Star coaches, while trying to win, also know that it’s their duty to get most of the roster into the game. For pitchers, this means maybe giving a long-relief pitcher only one inning, because there’s a line behind him of other pitchers who’ve earned the right to be in the game.
2) Again mostly related to pitchers, All Star coaches just can’t feel right about letting some guy who doesn’t play for their team over-extend himself in late innings. If Garde uses up his relief and has to let Guerrier pitch 4 innings b/c there’s no more bull-pen support in a reg-season game, well that’s a decision he gets to make with his player. But if Francona threw Nathan in in the 12th with no one behind him in the all star game, and then kept him in for 50 pitches, Garde would have every right to come after his head.

Sorry for the ramble, but my unsupported solution would be: In an All-Star game, any player can re-enter the game. Mostly I think this applies to pitchers, but I’m sure, again, Garde wouldn’t have wanted Mauer to catch 15 innings either, what with the way he mollycoddles him. So any player, any position, re-entry into the game is always an option. (Of course you can all ignore this thread-jack, I’m just doing what I can to get off of the Favre train.)

muxhut says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:01 pm

Note on my thread-jack: I’m only trying to apply this to All-Star games.

Nate says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

I like the re-entry idea, but I am not sure many managers would want their pitcher to be re-entered after leaving the game and icing the arm…

(inspired by Hamilton’s HR derby pitcher…)
After 15 innings, you pitch to your own team in whatever way they like, and you only get 1 pitch (all are 3rd strikes). Anything in front of the pitcher or foul = automatic out. (ok, so probably not.)

Deacon says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

I was thinking about the All-Star game problems last night around the time of the 15th inning (I actually watched the whole thing, which on the East Coast was apparently unheard of). Anyway, as I figured it, the problem is running out of pitchers, not necessarily position players. The biggest problem I see with allowing the re-entry of pitchers is that I don’t think any pitcher would want to re-enter! I’m no pitcher, but I think that after your warm-ups, and then your actual work (1 out, 1 inning, whatever), you probably have gotten stiff, or iced down, or done whatever you do following your pitching routine. And if the game has gone on long enough where you need to possibly re-enter, you probably pitched an hour+ ago, and really are in no shape to try and get yourself ready to go back in and throw major league pitches.

So, my solution would be that you are allowed to have position players re-enter the game, to pitch.

That way, you figure out which guys have had any experience pitching (Ankiel perennial All Star now?), and you throw them in there if you’ve exhausted all other options. While they may not be the best pitchers out there, it will be entertaining for fans, and will likely result in some runs being scored which really should be the point at that time in the game. Plus, when the ASG is in National League parks, the game could end on a walk-off homerun from the “pitcher”…

Perhaps more practically, they should expand the rosters for the ASG and ensure that there is a full set of pitchers for the game (guys like Webb, Kazmir, etc. who can’t really pitch in the game would be recognized as All Stars, but replaced with rested/able-bodied pitchers).

Dave MN says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

Okay, how about this discussion to get off the Favre talk?

Should the Twins make a move for the 3rd baseman of a selling team (prime examples: Adrian Beltre and Garret Atkins)

Apparently the Twins have shown interest in Beltre, but I think Atkins, if he’s on the market, should be their top choice.

lattewarrior says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:47 pm

What about trading Baltimore Span and an arm for Sherril and Melvin Mora? A nasty lefthander would look good setting up for Nathan and Mora would be a huge upgrade at 3B.

I’m not as big on Beltre as others, even though his road splits would seem to indicate that he’d benefit from a change of scenery.

Atkins seems to be the most talented of the group, but wouldn’t he be a rental? Beltre has a deal through 09 or 10. Mora, too.

Dave MN says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

I don’t think the Twins would look at Atkins as a rental. He definitely fits into the idea of the young core group of players. If anything, they could keep Span, trade Cuddyer and use the money saved in the Cuddy trade to sign Atkins long-term.

Clarence Swamptown says:

July 16th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

Unless Seattle is willing to give Beltre away (only take a low level prospect) as a salary dump, I would prefer to go forward with the Buscher/Harris platoon. Then see if they can sign a quality right handed free agent to a 1 or 2 year deal in the offseason (Blake, Crede?) as a stopgap until Velencia, et al are ready.

If a trade is to be had using excess pitching for a stud 3B prospect that would be under our control for a number of years, I would be OK with that too.

If Beltre doesn’t work out, it’s just a bloated contract that the Twins would have to unload somehow. He doesn’t give them a big enough upgrade over Buscher/Harris to justify that risk.

Dave MN says:

July 16th, 2008 at 2:01 pm

Then see if they can sign a quality right handed free agent to a 1 or 2 year deal in the offseason (Blake, Crede?) as a stopgap until Velencia, et al are ready.

When have the Twins ever been active in free agency? I think the trade route is the only way anything is ever going to happen.

I agree on Beltre though. I don’t know that he’s worth what we’d give up, particularly if his slump isn’t a slump. It must be said though. He has more HRs than anyone on our team right now.

Clarence Swamptown says:

July 16th, 2008 at 2:09 pm

Dave-

Agreed on Atkins, he seems like a good fit and the Rockies seem like compatible trading partners. He is not a free agent until after 2010. If a reasonable trade for him is available, go for it. Give him a season away from Coors and if he fits in, try for a long term deal.

You are right, the Twins are rarely active in the free agent market. And when they are it backfires. I just get this feeling Casey Blake and his tremendous beard will be wearing a Twins uniform next year.