<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will gas hit $4 a gallon here?</title>
	<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/</link>
	<description>Travel along with our transportation geek</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roadguy</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13887</link>
		<dc:creator>Roadguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13887</guid>
		<description>Voting is now closed. Thanks to all who picked a date!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voting is now closed. Thanks to all who picked a date!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsimon</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13831</link>
		<dc:creator>bsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13831</guid>
		<description>DGB writes
"Gold achieved fame for his 1992 paper “The Deep Hot Biosphere” in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which presented a controversial view of the origin of coal, oil, and gas deposits, a theory of an abiogenic petroleum origin."

Curious.  This must be the new pseudo science making the rounds of the internet.  This is the second time in a week that I've heard about the theorized abiogenic origins of petroleum.  

Here's the deal: whether or not the theory is correct, it is irrelevant - unless the abiogenic form of petroleum production can produce roughly 80 million barrels of oil per day.  

In other words, it doesn't matter where petroleum came from - whether its from God, from decomposing plant matter, or from extremeophile bacteria - if we're consuming it faster than its being replaced, we need to find alternatives to oil.

(My data is from a google search, which answers the global oil consumption question as: "between 2002 and 2006 the daily consumption was between 78 and 85 million barrels a day.")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DGB writes<br />
&#8220;Gold achieved fame for his 1992 paper “The Deep Hot Biosphere” in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which presented a controversial view of the origin of coal, oil, and gas deposits, a theory of an abiogenic petroleum origin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Curious.  This must be the new pseudo science making the rounds of the internet.  This is the second time in a week that I&#8217;ve heard about the theorized abiogenic origins of petroleum.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: whether or not the theory is correct, it is irrelevant - unless the abiogenic form of petroleum production can produce roughly 80 million barrels of oil per day.  </p>
<p>In other words, it doesn&#8217;t matter where petroleum came from - whether its from God, from decomposing plant matter, or from extremeophile bacteria - if we&#8217;re consuming it faster than its being replaced, we need to find alternatives to oil.</p>
<p>(My data is from a google search, which answers the global oil consumption question as: &#8220;between 2002 and 2006 the daily consumption was between 78 and 85 million barrels a day.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bajurny</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13828</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bajurny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13828</guid>
		<description>High speed rail could move cargo containers between major cities, then at the cities the containers are unloaded on to trucks for local delivery.

And also, you don't seem to understand government very well.  Unless we had a national referendum, "the people" didn't choose to build the interstates.

I think I understand how this works.  If the government does something you don't support, like raise the gas tax, you complain about the legislators not representing the people.  But if they do something you like, like build the interstate system, they are enacting the will of the people.  I'm confused, which is it?

I think you're the one living in a fairy tale world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High speed rail could move cargo containers between major cities, then at the cities the containers are unloaded on to trucks for local delivery.</p>
<p>And also, you don&#8217;t seem to understand government very well.  Unless we had a national referendum, &#8220;the people&#8221; didn&#8217;t choose to build the interstates.</p>
<p>I think I understand how this works.  If the government does something you don&#8217;t support, like raise the gas tax, you complain about the legislators not representing the people.  But if they do something you like, like build the interstate system, they are enacting the will of the people.  I&#8217;m confused, which is it?</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re the one living in a fairy tale world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barryS</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13826</link>
		<dc:creator>barryS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13826</guid>
		<description>Comrade DGB - actually, when Peter says streetcar systems were sometimes required to pay for the maintenance of the entire road, that would be like mass transit today being required to pay for your roads, not your ridiculous inversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade DGB - actually, when Peter says streetcar systems were sometimes required to pay for the maintenance of the entire road, that would be like mass transit today being required to pay for your roads, not your ridiculous inversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGB</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13824</link>
		<dc:creator>DGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13824</guid>
		<description>Peter says: "First of all, the notion that the “free market” chooses automobiles is crazy. We currently live in a society where the car is dominant, but it did not evolve this way. Choices have been made by the government "

Yes, the government (the elected government) has chosen.

Peter continues: "Streetcar systems were sometimes required to pay for the maintenance of the entire road "  

Yes, just like today, where all us  drivers have to support the mass transit system.

Peter continues: "Transit is not good at serving these post WWII neighborhoods. Essentially the government was encouraging the use of cars."  

Once again Peter, it was OUR government, the elected government.  Sorry you can't nullify the elected government by the people, for the people.

Peter continues: "Second, the Interstate system. Imagine for a moment, if you will, that instead of Hitler building the Autobahn, he had built a high speed rail network. When Eisenhower was in Germany, he was impressed with the Autobahn. Now imagine if he would have been impressed with Germany’s high speed rail system?"

What a stupid thought!  Hitler bulit highways, Eisenhower understood this.  Trucks can travel on any road.   Trains can only travel on tracks.  It did not happen.  Your assumption and conclusion are faulty and illogical.

Peter continues:  "What if, instead of building a network of high-speed freeways, Eisenhower built a system of high speed rail? "

Another stupid, what if.  What if the moon was made of green cheese.  It did not happen.

Peter, you live in your own fairy tale world.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter says: &#8220;First of all, the notion that the “free market” chooses automobiles is crazy. We currently live in a society where the car is dominant, but it did not evolve this way. Choices have been made by the government &#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, the government (the elected government) has chosen.</p>
<p>Peter continues: &#8220;Streetcar systems were sometimes required to pay for the maintenance of the entire road &#8221;  </p>
<p>Yes, just like today, where all us  drivers have to support the mass transit system.</p>
<p>Peter continues: &#8220;Transit is not good at serving these post WWII neighborhoods. Essentially the government was encouraging the use of cars.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Once again Peter, it was OUR government, the elected government.  Sorry you can&#8217;t nullify the elected government by the people, for the people.</p>
<p>Peter continues: &#8220;Second, the Interstate system. Imagine for a moment, if you will, that instead of Hitler building the Autobahn, he had built a high speed rail network. When Eisenhower was in Germany, he was impressed with the Autobahn. Now imagine if he would have been impressed with Germany’s high speed rail system?&#8221;</p>
<p>What a stupid thought!  Hitler bulit highways, Eisenhower understood this.  Trucks can travel on any road.   Trains can only travel on tracks.  It did not happen.  Your assumption and conclusion are faulty and illogical.</p>
<p>Peter continues:  &#8220;What if, instead of building a network of high-speed freeways, Eisenhower built a system of high speed rail? &#8221;</p>
<p>Another stupid, what if.  What if the moon was made of green cheese.  It did not happen.</p>
<p>Peter, you live in your own fairy tale world.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barryS</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13819</link>
		<dc:creator>barryS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13819</guid>
		<description>DGB - I love how you complain and complain and complain about how everyone is a communist; and yet you trumpet out a theory from 1950s Cold War Soviet research that is generally regarded as 'hocus pocus' in Western society. 

Indeed, Thomas Gold was initially accused of stealing most of his work from communist research. Once 'found out' he started crediting that research and stated that he simply developed the same theory in parallel.  Riiight.  30 years later.

The whole argument of biogenic versus abiogenic origins is generally seen to be politically and economically  influenced and not scientific. In that way, it resembles the Global Warming debate.  Personally, I think it resembles UFOlogy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufology

But - I guess communism must not be so bad after all, Da 'Comrade DGB'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DGB - I love how you complain and complain and complain about how everyone is a communist; and yet you trumpet out a theory from 1950s Cold War Soviet research that is generally regarded as &#8216;hocus pocus&#8217; in Western society. </p>
<p>Indeed, Thomas Gold was initially accused of stealing most of his work from communist research. Once &#8216;found out&#8217; he started crediting that research and stated that he simply developed the same theory in parallel.  Riiight.  30 years later.</p>
<p>The whole argument of biogenic versus abiogenic origins is generally seen to be politically and economically  influenced and not scientific. In that way, it resembles the Global Warming debate.  Personally, I think it resembles UFOlogy.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufology" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufology</a></p>
<p>But - I guess communism must not be so bad after all, Da &#8216;Comrade DGB&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdxtran</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13818</link>
		<dc:creator>pdxtran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13818</guid>
		<description>Even if gas reaches $4 a gallon this summer, it will still be a bargain by international standards. It's been around $5 a gallon or more in Japan for years, and it's about $7 a gallon in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if gas reaches $4 a gallon this summer, it will still be a bargain by international standards. It&#8217;s been around $5 a gallon or more in Japan for years, and it&#8217;s about $7 a gallon in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGB</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13814</link>
		<dc:creator>DGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13814</guid>
		<description>Barry says: "then we will have the exact opposite of Matty’s utopia: worn down streets overloaded bumper-to-bumper with big boiling hot cars, drivers with boiling hot tempers"

Sort sounds like 35W and 62 right now :)

Speaking of streets: There are many truely bad streets in Mpls.  Litteraly disintegrating, some streets are comprised of patches.  

What I don't get is why they are rebuilding the Nicollet Mall, when so many other streets badly need fixing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry says: &#8220;then we will have the exact opposite of Matty’s utopia: worn down streets overloaded bumper-to-bumper with big boiling hot cars, drivers with boiling hot tempers&#8221;</p>
<p>Sort sounds like 35W and 62 right now <img src='http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Speaking of streets: There are many truely bad streets in Mpls.  Litteraly disintegrating, some streets are comprised of patches.  </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get is why they are rebuilding the Nicollet Mall, when so many other streets badly need fixing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13813</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13813</guid>
		<description>Interesting, DGB. If there is more oil than once thought, it's comforting... But, we still need to find ways to get it. And the suits that set the prices don't care whether there's a teaspoon of oil left on earth, or whether we have trillions of tons below our feet...

And, if alternative transport is equally hard to come by, then we will have the exact opposite of Matty's utopia:  worn down streets overloaded bumper-to-bumper with big boiling hot cars, drivers with boiling hot tempers... shelling out big bucks to go nine miles an hour, and then shelling out more cash to park their big vehicles--and then having to walk a  half mile to the office, anyway. (Hmm... that already sounds kinda familiar...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, DGB. If there is more oil than once thought, it&#8217;s comforting&#8230; But, we still need to find ways to get it. And the suits that set the prices don&#8217;t care whether there&#8217;s a teaspoon of oil left on earth, or whether we have trillions of tons below our feet&#8230;</p>
<p>And, if alternative transport is equally hard to come by, then we will have the exact opposite of Matty&#8217;s utopia:  worn down streets overloaded bumper-to-bumper with big boiling hot cars, drivers with boiling hot tempers&#8230; shelling out big bucks to go nine miles an hour, and then shelling out more cash to park their big vehicles&#8211;and then having to walk a  half mile to the office, anyway. (Hmm&#8230; that already sounds kinda familiar&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGB</title>
		<link>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13812</link>
		<dc:creator>DGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ww3.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2008/05/15/when-will-gas-hit-4-a-gallon-here/#comment-13812</guid>
		<description>"Hydrocarbons are not biology reworked by geology (as the traditional view would hold) but rather geology reworked by biology." – Thomas Gold 

Gold achieved fame for his 1992 paper "The Deep Hot Biosphere" in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which presented a controversial view of the origin of coal, oil, and gas deposits, a theory of an abiogenic petroleum origin. The theory suggests coal and crude oil deposits have their origins in natural gas flows which feed bacteria living at extreme depths under the surface of the Earth; in other words, oil and coal are produced through tectonic forces, rather than from the decomposition of fossils. At the beginning of his 1992 paper Gold also referred to ocean vents that pump bacteria from the depth of the earth towards the ocean floor in support of his views. A number of new such hydrothermal vents have since been discovered, as recently as 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hydrocarbons are not biology reworked by geology (as the traditional view would hold) but rather geology reworked by biology.&#8221; – Thomas Gold </p>
<p>Gold achieved fame for his 1992 paper &#8220;The Deep Hot Biosphere&#8221; in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences which presented a controversial view of the origin of coal, oil, and gas deposits, a theory of an abiogenic petroleum origin. The theory suggests coal and crude oil deposits have their origins in natural gas flows which feed bacteria living at extreme depths under the surface of the Earth; in other words, oil and coal are produced through tectonic forces, rather than from the decomposition of fossils. At the beginning of his 1992 paper Gold also referred to ocean vents that pump bacteria from the depth of the earth towards the ocean floor in support of his views. A number of new such hydrothermal vents have since been discovered, as recently as 2007</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
