StarTribune.com

Beisbol-a-GO-GO asks a powerful question…

Posted on July 24th, 2008 – 8:56 AM
By Howard

…and I want to know what you think, too. Rather than a shopping list of all that went wrong in New York — Pitchers losing it, Casilla reverting on defense, Buscher looking like a busher, Morneau’s one hit (the hand, the hand, the hand), Perkins’ meltdown, Punto watching strikes, Gomez’ problems and other stuff that I’ve probably blocked out — I figure it’s a good time to post a question raised in the previous comment section.

It also seems like a good time to offer some love from the Section 220 keyboard: I went through yesterday’s comments and was struck, once again, by the combination of civility and passion that the vast, vast majority of you bring to this blog. Yes, every now and again one of you takes a chunk out of my leg (or the leg of one of the other commenters), but there’s a load of substance in all those words. Folks who don’t read the comments on this blog are really shortchanged.

Another journalist asked me a few weeks back how many comments I had to delete to keep the conversation “so civil.” I told him less than 1 in 100. He was shocked.

I hope you all keep reading and responding.

Now, on to Beisbol-a-GO-GO’s question:

Are there any graybeards on this blog who were alive and a serious Twins fan BT (before TK)? I have a question that bugs me no end and I would like a knowledgeable answer, so please don’t fake an answer if you were not alive or a Twins fan years ago.

The Twins are universally praised in baseballdom and by the media as running a superb fundamentally sound baseball program and organization, e.g. the emphasis and success with good pitching, good defense and good small ball. But why is it the Twins treat pulling the ball with gusto to yank one out like a capital crime punishable by the electric chair or maybe a firing squad?

I know, I know, hitting the ball the other way is a great way for a hitter to get out of a slump. Fine, I’m OK with that. But it seems like there is an organization-wide allergy to power. Players who are drafted either don’t have it to begin with or are soon “cured” of it when they come up through the farm system. Players who arrive in a trade either have or develop the same profile.

I know we have Jason (Morneau) and also the real Jason (Kubel). But other than that it’s like pulling teeth. And years ago we did have power. What happened??? Someone, please explain. I ask because even if we got someone like a Beltre, is he only going to end up morphing into a real Twin??

Have at it, folks. Or ask your own question. Seems like a good way to spend an off day.

page counter other people are here too

On Liriano: it’s time

Posted on July 22nd, 2008 – 10:40 PM
By Howard

All things being almost equal, I think it’s time to bring up Francisco Liriano and give him a try. Tonight, he pitched seven innings against Toledo — one of the better teams in the International League — and shut down the Hens for seven innings on two hits and two walks over seven innings. That brought his Rochester record to 9-2, 3.13, including one earned run in his last 35 innings.

That’s a 0.26 ERA.

Right now is the time to move one of the young starters to long relief and see what Liriano can do. Having a second lefty in the rotation trumps the current arrangement, and the pitcher who gets demoted (Slowey or Blackburn) needs to see this as a chance for the Twins to make a serious run at the division — in the same way that a trade for a right-handed bat is going to cost the current right-handers some playing time.

Besides, there’s probably going to be a key game or two when the Twins are going to need a spot starter, even if all arms stay healthy. (Think road rainouts and the potential for a doubleheader or two.)

It doesn’t make sense to keep Brian Bass in Minnesota and Liriano in Rochester. At this point, it simply doesn’t.

The best scenario: Monday night at the Metrodome against the White Sox. Liriano takes Slowey’s spot in the rotation for the opener of the big four-game series. The White Sox pretty much chewed through the Twins rotation last month, so let’s give ‘em a different look and see what happens.

page counter other people are here too

Batting leadoff tonight … Denard Span

Posted on July 22nd, 2008 – 3:27 PM
By Howard

This is LaVelle’s news not mine, but he just called in and told one of the editors that he saw the lineup card for tonight’s game. Carlos Gomez has been dropped to the No. 9 spot in the batting order and Denard Span is leading off.

LaVelle will have more later after he talks to Gardy.

Start the chant: The people… united… will never be defeated!

page counter other people are here too

Cranky reactions to a lousy loss

Posted on July 22nd, 2008 – 7:52 AM
By Howard

More than anything, it was probably the sight of Sidney Ponson shutting down the Twins on a night when he had mediocre stuff. That’s what it looked like watching him and that’s what he said during a postgame interview on the Yankees broadcast.

Or it could have been the give-up at-bats that seemed to permeate the batting order after the Twins fell behind 6-2. There was a little too much flailing at the plate when a measured approach could have wreaked some havoc against a pitcher who said he “got behind a lot of guys.” Where were the intelligent at-bats of last week’s Detroit comeback?

Or maybe it was watching Denard Span (.424 on-base percentage) go 3-for-4 while batting ninth and Carlos Gomez (.281) going 0-for-5 in the leadoff spot. This simply has to stop. I was willing to give Gardy benefit of the doubt last week, but after the last two games, charity has left the keyboard. (For the record, 74 percent of the 3,400-plus people who voted in our “poll” yesterday said Gomez should be batting ninth.)

Or maybe it’s my suspicion that Morneau’s hand was bothering him at the plate last night, despite the reports that he’s fine. That was an ugly 0-for-4. Please let me be wrong on that one.

Or it could have been watching the Yankees play small ball when they went from a 2-2 tie to a 6-2 lead in the seventh with an assortment of just-barely hits and Alexi Casilla’s unfortunate bouncing throw home that Mauer couldn’t contain.

Or maybe it’s the silliness about Nick Blackburn being “too strong” after his eight-day layoff — and having Dick’n'Bert cite that as a reason he stunk last night. If the Twins had been concerns about Blackburn being “too strong” they would have:

a) Started him on Friday so he would have been pitching on his usual rest.

b) Had him work a strenuous bullpen session between starts to keep his arm “tired.”

Sometimes, pitchers simply have stinky outings. At least Ron Coomer, watching from the stands, pointed out that his fastball was flat instead of sinking and Blackburn said the layoff wasn’t the problem.

Also, after watching the All-Star Game last week, I didn’t need to see great Yankee and Yankee Stadium moments again during a Twins telecast. It seemed hollow by comparison and hokey, all the more when they cut away at one point to show Coomer’s first at-bat home run during his stint with the Yankees. (Keep in mind, of course, that everything I’ve written about so far left me in no mood to listen to happy talk about enemy property. As I keyboard, my calm self is urging my mad self to chill. “Yo, self. If the Twins were ahead 12-4 would … this… bother… you???)

If the Twins broadcast crew wants to do something special the next couple of games, they should show Morneau’s home run off Ron Villone two years back — and his scowling-and-growling run around the bases because of the earlier game when Villone beaned Morneau. Or show Shannon Stewart running into the wall to make that catch during the ‘03 playoffs. Or even the Don Mattingly home run that caused Ron Davis to break down and cry in the Yankee Stadium clubhouse back in the mid ’80s. (Morning Update: And, of course, they should show Bert’s F-bombin’ intro from a couple of years back. How could I effin’ forget?)

Just don’t show me any more Derek Jeter and A-Rod moments.

Growl, grumble. Twins are only a half-game out. Good job in Chicago, Josh Hamilton.

Get ‘em tonight.

page counter other people are here too

The attack of the oddly named home-run hitting catcher

Posted on July 21st, 2008 – 10:10 AM
By Howard

If your name is Taylor Teagarden and you’re a jock, you’d better be good. Just sayin.’

After the aforementioned Mr. Teagarden (it only seems right to use the honorific) was the offensive difference in yesterday’s 1-0 victory over Scott Baker, it brought to mind the other home run by an unfortunately named catcher that once did in the Twins: the legendary Jamie Quirk home run in Cleveland back in ‘84 that pretty much KO’d the Twins from the pennant race.

The Quirk home run, in the final series of the season, was his only hit of 1984. Mr. Teagarden’s homer is his only hit with the Rangers so far, and there’s a good chance it will remain so for quite a while. Mr. T has been named to the Olympic team and, in order to participate in Beijing, he needs to be returned to the minors by Tuesday.

An aside: The Rangers current have three catchers on their roster. Mr. T, Gerald Jarrod Saltalamacchia and Maximiliano (Max) Ramirez — and one of them is almost certain to go when the Rangers reactivate two injured players. Saltalamacchia was sick this weekend, which explained Mr. Teagarden’s call-up. Someone on a Rangers blog has suggested the team combine the catchers into one “super psopect” who would be named Maximus Saltalamacchia-Teagarden. While that won’t happen, Lord knows that Saltalamacchia’s sister better not do a marry-and-hyphenate deal with Mr. T.

Read the rest of this entry »